This is just a reminder that all of the recent newsposts found on this site are just reposted from the HTMLCenter blog.  Fortunately or unfortunately (depending on how you look at it) I am so busy working on redesigning the Ten-321 Enterprises Web site and finishing beta development on CAGCMS that I have no time to post any real news about my progress.

I promise to post an update on the development of CAGCMS within the next week or two.  In addition, as soon as I have some major IE-specific design bugs worked out in the new Ten-321 site design, I will be posting a link to the development site so that you can keep an active eye on my progress.

As mentioned in an earlier newspost, I am completely redeveloping the Ten-321 Web site from the ground up.  I am completely rewriting all of the text found on the site (which is an extremely time-consuming and tedious task) and reorganizing the structure of the Web site, in addition to redesigning the site template.

While searching for some information at work, I came across a really neat Web 2.0 application called Gizmoz. Gizmoz allows you to create 3-D animated, talking characters for use on your Web site, in your blog, in your e-mail, for your own amusement, etc.

Starting Out

First off, you will need a good picture of yourself (or whomever you want to animate). The pic needs to be a clean, close-up of the subject's face.

Once you've got that, you simply head on over to Gizmoz.com and sign up for a free account. When you sign-up, you'll be automatically given a handful of "points" (when I signed up, they gave me 500 – I don't know how long that particular promotion lasts). Those points can be used to add a little extra pizazz to your character. You don't need points, though, as you can do a lot without them.

What can you do?

Once you generate your "Gizmo" (or character), you can then use it in all kinds of great ways. You can create an answering machine (great for you people that do a lot of social networking online), you can create a Flash movie, you can make an animated sticker (which is what I've done above), you can download the clip as a WMV video, etc.

You get to choose from all kinds of different backgrounds, accessories, body types, and so much more.

Make it talk

Now that you've got a character, you obviously want it to say something. Well, with Gizmoz you've got three options. You can use their text-to-speech converter (which is what I've done in the sticker above), you can record your voice, you can upload your own audio clip or you can use a pre-recorded audio clip already available on the site (which is what I've done with the clip below).

The Engine

The engine that generates the characters is really quite amazing. All you do is pick a close-up shot of your face, upload it to the Gizmoz Web site, and the animation engine automatically detects your ears, eyes, nose, mouth and other facial features. Then, the picture is morphed into a three-dimensional animated character's head. It really is pretty wild.

The really amazing part is, no matter what kind of background you have in the picture, the engine does a pretty nice job of cleaning it up and picking out just the face. I realize that it's not perfect, but I've seen pictures edited by professional graphic designers that have halos worse than what you get out of this automated engine (which doesn't say much for the graphic designer, but that's beside the point).

Summary

Basically, Gizmoz is a clone of SitePals, with a heavy slant toward the social networking crowd. It's fun and the character creation is very impressive. Best of all, it's completely free to play with all of it, which is more than I can say for SitePals.

I'm not sure how long Gizmoz has been around, but it seems to be in the "public beta" stages at the moment. It's a lot of fun to play with, and you can come up with some really creative looking characters.

Be sure to check it out and make yourself a character. If you get a good one, share it with us here at HTMLCenter.

Just for fun, here's a clip I made out of the same character:

My Answering Machine While you're checking everything out, go ahead and leave me a message on my personalized answering machine.

Well, Yahoo! has developed a new Web 2.0 beta version of its "My Yahoo!" interface. So far, I'm not impressed. Here are some gripes I have about the "upgrade":

1. The small header at the top of the page is gone. There used to be a very small header in the top right corner that told you whether or not you had any new mail (and how many messages were new, if you did have any). It also included links to Yahoo! and "Everything Yahoo!" (a list of all of the services Yahoo! offers).
2. I can't search the TV listings from my My Yahoo! page anymore
3. I have no choices when viewing my "Yahoo! mail" preview. In the old My Yahoo!, there were links to your inbox, to compose a new message and to update the list of my new messages (which would essentially reload the My Yahoo! page). Now, I can't do any of that. I only get the choice to go directly to one of the messages on my list or to go to the main page of my Yahoo! mail
4. The advertisements are extremely obtrusive. At least in the old version, they were at the top of the page in the standard banner format. Now, the advertisements are in very large boxes in the middle of my page.

However, there are also some nice new "Web 2.0" features. Some of those are as follows:

1. My mail preview updates itself automatically.
2. If I mouse over a message subject, I get a summary of the message content in a little "tooltip" type of window.
3. Some space on my page is conserved by adding "pages" to some of the widgets. For instance, in the sports widget, "Today" and "Yesterday" on separate layers and you can switch back and forth between them. In the old version, they were just one big long list all together.
4. It's much easier to collapse and expand all of the various widgets.

Digital cameras

Okay, so digital cameras have come a long way in the last 5 or 10 years. However, there are some really fantastic features that are becoming more and more impossible to find in newer cameras. One of those "features" is a viewfinder. The newer a digital camera is, the lower the chance that it actually has a viewfinder. Unfortunately, the newer cameras are getting bigger and more powerful LCD screens, too. Why is that a bad thing? Well, because, frankly, I don't feel like changing the batteries in my camera every time I take a picture.

Another problem with newer digital cameras is the shutter lag time. My dad's old Olympus camera was just like a 35-mm camera regarding its shutter lag time. You pressed the button and it took the picture. More and more, you'll find that the shutter lag time of digital cameras is getting longer and longer. With my mom's newer digital camera, when you press the button, it is literally close to a second before it actually snaps the photo. If you have red-eye reduction turned on, it is generally longer than a second. That's fine for taking still-life pictures, but it really sucks when you're trying to take a picture of someone jumping into a pool or doing a trick or something. You literally have to anticipate every picture you plan on taking, and plan well in advance for it.

Basically, if you want to take a picture of someone in the middle of doing a flip, you have to press the button before giving them the okay to start doing the flip.

Granted, some of the higher-end cameras are now boasting minimal shutter lag times, but you can forget about getting anything like that for less than a few Benjamins.

Digital Media Players

Whatever happened to large-capacity mp3 players? Why is it so hard to find anything that holds more than a couple of gigs? Two years ago, I bought a 40-gigabyte player (which was the mid-size model; with 10-gig, 20-gig and 60-gig models available) for about $200.

When I look at mp3 players now, I see price tags that are the same size, but the hard drives are literally a fraction of that size. I don't even know if 40-gig players are still available anywhere. I have certainly been hard-pressed to find one, which is why I recently had to perform surgery on my player, which had died. Thankfully I was able to bring it back from the dead by taking it apart, putting it back together and re-installing the operating system.

So, I'm finally ready to write a review of Windows Vista. After buying a new computer a few months ago, and playing with Vista quite a bit, I feel I can wrtie a decent overview of the pros and cons that come along with it.

I will be forthright in saying that I am not a huge fan of Microsoft. If I could get along in the business world without having to use Microsoft products, I would be perfectly happy working directly through a Linux build and working entirely with free, open-source software.

That said, I have been a Microsoft user for over 20 years. I have been using Microsoft products since the days when DOS was the main operating system for PC users. I have quite a bit of experience in Windows, and have used Windows 3.1, Windows 98 (and SE), Windows ME and Windows XP extensively. I have fooled around with Windows Server 2000 and a few other MS operating systems. With all that said, I hope you will recognize that I am being as objective as possible.

Aesthetics

From the start, Windows Vista looks pretty. One thing that Microsoft does well when creating new milestone releases is to upgrade the look and feel of the system. Windows 3.1 was a huge step up from DOS (obviously: it had a GUI, after all). WIndows 98 was another giant leap from 3.1. Then, XP came along (after a few dud releases), and turned everything everyone knew about Windows on its head. Once again, Microsoft has made a huge improvement on the appearance, and I'm sure it has thrown a lot of people off their rockers, complaining that it's "different".

Personally, I like the look. Of course, that could be simply because it is basically a sleeker looking version of the more recent KDE interfaces. I really feel like Microsoft spent a lot of time studying the way KDE looks and operates, and then decided to adapt all of that for Windows.

From the spherical "start" icon all the way down to the built-in "start menu" search and the multiple choice "shutdown" menu, Vista's look is eerily similar to KDE. Add on top of that the adjustable transparency of the titlebars, etc., and you've got something very similar to what KDE's looked like since at least the early days of version 3. Granted, much of the latest version of KDE also nabbed some elements from Vista (the multi-page program menu, etc.), so it's obviously a "mutual admiration".

LIke I said, though, it's pretty.

Features

Vista has some very nice features built in, but Microsoft also removed some minor items that were really nice in older versions.

The aforementioned "search" function built into the "start" menu

This is a really nice feature. When you have as many programs installed as I do, you switch back and forth between Linux and Windows as much as I do and you use as many different computers as I do, you begin to lose track of what's installed on what computers/operating systems. Being able to type in a keyword in my start menu makes it really easy to find things. This is especially helpful when you install things that don't necessarily embed themselves in your "Programs" area.

The "Vista Sidebar"

This is a neat feature, too. Basically, Vista took a page out of the "Yahoo Widgets" book, and made their own widget side bar (if I'm not mistaken, I think this was actually an out-of-the-box feature in MacOS before Yahoo or MS thought of it). Currently, I have a calendar, the weather, a clock, an RSS aggregator and a little slideshow widget running on mine. These are the default widgets that came with my version of Vista. I don't really have any use for the slideshow widget, but I do use the clock and the weather all the time. The calendar saves me the hassle of having to mouse over my taskbar clock to see what today's date is. The RSS aggregator is extremely nice, especially because it's integrated directly into Outlook. Any RSS feed you add to Outlook (which is a fantastic new feature in Office 2007) automatically gets added to your sidebar aggregator.

Custom toolbars

This is another item that's been pulled from the Linux playbook. Basically, you can right-click on your taskbar and then choose any folder on your entire computer that you want to turn into a toolbar. This almost makes up for the lack of the next feature I'm about to mention.

Quick Launch

Unfortunately, one of the features Microsoft removed from Windows is the ability to "un-dock" the Quick Launch tool bar. On all of my computers, I immediately rearrange my "bars" on my desktop. I move my taskbar to the top of my screen and set it to auto-hide. My Quick Launch bar then gets set to auto-hide at the bottom of my desktop, and I set it to display large icons. Because I keep so many icons in my Quick Launch bar, I have to keep it completely separate from my taskbar. The image below shows my current setup.

Auto-sort

This is a really minor feature, but I like it. If you've spent a lot of time rearranging your files in Windows XP, you've probably noticed that any new file or folder you create in Explorer, or any items you paste into a new location always get added to the bottom of the file listing. This always annoyed me. Vista automatically moves the file immediately to the correct place as soon as you create it. In fact, when you create a new folder, it initially moves it to the "N" section (alphabetically) of your file list (since the initial name is "New Folder"), and then moves it again when you give the folder a name.

Intuitive Icons and File Details

Vista uses intuitive file/folder icons and file details much more effectively than XP ever did. Vista is set, by default, to use different icons for folders depending on what's inside of the folder. In addition, it shows you a neat little cascade of thumbnails of the files inside. The image below shows what my "pictures" folder looks like in Vista.

Windows Media Center

I realize this was introduced in XP, but it's been improved upon for Vista. Having not used it too much in XP, I cannot comment too much on the improvements, but I can say that Media Center is a really nice program if you don't plan on doing anything but working with media files. Of course, if you like to listen to music while working on other things on your computer, Media Center is completely useless. However, it's great to watch movies through Media Center or use it as a jukebox when hanging out with friends.

Vista Security Center

This is a good thing and a bad thing wrapped up together. It's nice to have this little feature built in when you have multiple users on your computer. This security center should help stem the tide of spyware/adware that gets installed on your computer unknowingly when people visit bad Web sites. After all, if they try to visit a Web site, and a big warning comes up telling them that Windows needs permission to continue, then that may set off a light bulb in the user's head letting them know that they probably shouldn't continue.

However, if the user is inconsiderate, as opposed to simply ignorant, they'll probably just click "Continue" anyway.

For those of us that actually know what we're doing, it's a real pain in the butt. The biggest pain associated with the security center is the fact that it's so redundant. Whenever I try to perform an "administrative" action, such as installing a program, creating a file or folder inside my protected directories, etc., Vista will tell me that it needs my permission to continue (which invariably resets my display driver, and can sometimes take a good second or two to come up on the screen, which scared the heck out of me the first few times it did so). Then, after I click "Continue", about 95% of the time, a second message will appear asking me for permission to continue. That's rather unnecessary, in my humble opinion. Asking me once is appropriate. Asking me twice is getting ridiculous.

This is one area where I wish Microsoft had studied the Linux play book a little more carefully. If I want to perform administrative actions in Linux, I can do so a number of ways. I can choose to do each action separately, in which case I will be prompted for the admin password each time. However, I can also choose to perform a whole batch of tasks as an admin user or even "temporarily" become an admin user (for instance, by opening the file manager in super user mode) to perform a number of tasks. This makes sense. The redundant "Continue or Allow" messages in Vista do not.

When dealing with the Vista Security Center, I generally just think of the Mac commercial and sit back and laugh. "Mac has issued a greeting. Continue or allow?"

Bugs and Other Issues

A few bugs and issues have cropped up while I've been using Vista, and most of them are quite annoying. Of course, having only used Vista on my personal home computer, which is an HP Pavilion that came with Vista (and everything else) pre-installed, I can't say with 100% certainty that Vista is completely to blame for all of these issues, so I mention them with that caveat.

Display Driver

My display driver occasionally fails and has to reset itself. This issue always pops up if I decide to try to use Media Center in the background (if I minimize Media Center, my display driver will fail and reset itself every 5 to 10 seconds). This also occurs intermittently while doing other things, like playing "Hearts".

Audio Driver

My computer came with one of those "Realtek High Definition Audio" drivers. The driver actually works very nicely, and provides great sound from my speakers. However, the downside is that it fails rather often, as well. The worst part is, whenever it fails, I have to reinstall it. I have confirmed that it quits working every time Windows performs an update. I'm not sure if it happens as a result of anything else. The problem seems to be that Windows automatically re-enables the default Windows audio driver, and there is no obvious way to disable it effectively. In order to start using the Realtek driver again (which is the only driver that actually puts out any sound), I have to reinstall the driver.

Occasional Crashes

My computer does crash occasionally. It's a very strange crash. It's not the classic "blue screen of death". Instead, I get a strange, multi-colored, pixelated display. It looks almost the way it would look if you were to fill up your entire screen with the "map" you see while you're de-fragging your computer. The only thing I can do at that point is to hold down the power button on my tower and turn it off.

Networking issues

For a while, every time I actually shut down my computer, my connection to the Internet would not work every time I turned it back on. I don't seem to have this problem too often anymore, but I do still have occasional networking issues that keep me from being able to access the Internet. From what I can tell, it seems that Windows decides to connect me to multiple network connections simultaneously, and that the bad network (the one that can't connect to the Internet) overrides anything on my normal network. To fix this, I have found it's effective to disable my network adapter and then re-enable it.

Software incompatibility

Although the number is decreasing almost daily, there are still quite a few programs that cannot be used on Vista, or that perform inconsistently. This, of course, is an issue with any milestone release of an operating system, but it still sucks having to deal with it. The real problem occurs, of course, when some of your favorite programs are no longer supported by their creators (Pagemaker, for example, which has been phased out by Adobe to make room for InDesign - not a huge loss, though, since Adobe has essentially made InDesign a clone of Pagemaker at this point, anyway). The part that really stinks is how little support there still is for Vista in the open-source freeware market.

In fact, I actually caused a somewhat major problem with my computer after having trouble installing some software I needed. Because I keep most of my "common" files on an ext2 partition, I needed to install and ext2 file system driver. However, Vista reported an error when I installed and tried to run extIFS. Therefore, I decided to install the less-appealing extfsd. That's when my problems began, although it probably took me a month to figure that out. Every time I tried to access files on my ext2 partition, Vista would eventually crash and restart my computer. I was able to solve the problem, though, by removing extfsd, at which point I found out that extIFS was actually working just fine.

I am also confused about the whole 32-bit/64-bit issue altogether. My computer is clearly running on a 64-bit dual-core processor. My version of Windows clearly says that it is the 64-bit version. 64-bit software is obviously compatible with my computer, as I installed the 64-bit version of SuSE Linux. However, every time I download the 64-bit version of any software I plan to install, it always throws up an error at me, telling me something along the lines of "This software was designed to run on a 64-bit system. It is incompatible with your system. Please download the 32-bit version". This has happened at least 3 or 4 times while trying to install software. Most recently, I had this problem when trying to install VirtualDub.

New File and Boot Systems

This is a good thing and a bad thing. I've heard varying reports on just how "new" the file system behind Vista is, and I'm sure that the handful of changes are the reason behind a lot of the new "features" I mentioned above. Unfortunately, the new file system and the new boot system really throw a monkey-wrench into the plans of those who plan to dual-boot. After toasting my first Pavilion, and waiting for months to get it back in new condition, I eventually had to install Linux on a completely separate hard drive in order to avoid toasting another computer. In order to be safe, I actually removed my main hard drive from the computer altogether before I even began installing SuSE. Now, rather than using a bootloader like Grub, I actually choose between operating systems by choosing my boot device through my bios.

Summary

All in all, Vista is certainly not terrible. However, Vista is not the milestone that Microsoft made it out to be. With the exception of a handful of nice features and a new look, Vista really does not offer that much that XP couldn't. There are very few items that Vista offers that couldn't have been supplied through a system update in XP. The improvements from XP to Vista pale in comparison to the improvements between Office XP and Office 2007 (but that's probably a review meant for another day).

I will admit that I like Vista as much as I could like an MS operating system. However, I still would prefer using SuSE with KDE if it was possible to do that realistically. All in all, though, it's really not bad.

Unfortunately, the Ten-321 Enterprises Web site, along with the non-commercial projects associated with it, have gone neglected for quite a while again.  However, I am now in a position to begin re-building the entire site again, and to finish initial development on the CAGCMS application used as the back-end of the Web site.

In the near future (read: over the next few months) I will be spending a good chunk of my free time completely re-creating the Ten-321 Web site from the ground up.  I will be developing an entirely new design for the site.  I will be completely re-building the CAGCMS application and releasing a public build on SourceForge (complete with plug-ins for extra menus, screenshots, etc.).  I will also be re-writing all of the content on the site in order to bring it into the present day.

A lot of things have changed since the content for this site was initially written, and a lot of the information on here is terribly outdated.  I will be adding new content to showcase the multiple new skillsets I've picked up over the last few years, and to educate potential customers as to the countless new developments on the Web in recent history.

For the time being, I will be using the news area of the Web site to syndicate the blog posts I make regularly on the HTMLCenter blog.  That will, at least, keep some fresh content on the site while I work behind the scenes to completely renovate the site. 

I have really been enjoying the start-up tips posted on CenterNetworks this month.  The other day, I decided to submit a few of my own tips, and they were posted today.  The article can be found on the CenterNetworks blog.

CAGCMS, the content management system developed by Ten-321 Enterprises is now ready for release.  The download package should be available within the next day or so.

New features in this package include:

• A complete Admin Center
• An editor for news items, site sections, site categories and site content that utilizes Tiny_MCE
• A maintenance section, allowing the administrator to back-up the database, and perform other useful maintenance tasks
• A user and usergroup editor
• Two sections completely devoted to setting your configuration variables.
• A simple template editor
• Multi-language support for the Admin Center (English is the only language included so far, but the language file can be translated very easily). 

Ten-321 Enterprises is proud to present a brand new site design.  The design is completely re-done from the ground up, and utilizes our new release of CAGCMS 0.2 to generate the content.

Please take the time to look around our new site, and check out the power of our simple content management system.

Ten-321 Enterprises is proud to present CAGCMS 0.2.  This is a complete and total re-write from scratch.

CAGCMS 0.2 includes its own news engine, utilizes TinyMCE for easy XHTML insertion, and has an extremely user-friendly template interface.

You can download the new package by visiting our SourceForge project page.